Service 04
Web Experiences
Web platforms that are fast on the hardware your users own, usable with a keyboard, and still correct when a regulator reads them.
- Capability 1
- Portals
- Capability 2
- Design systems
- Capability 3
- Accessibility
- Capability 4
- Performance
The approach
Accessibility and performance are the two requirements most often deferred and most expensive to add late. Both are architectural. A component library with the wrong semantics cannot be made accessible by a later audit, and a page that ships a megabyte of JavaScript cannot be made fast by compressing images.
So we treat WCAG 2.2 AA as a constraint from the first component and Core Web Vitals as a budget rather than a report. Both are measured in CI, on throttled hardware, against the real build.
For public sector and regulated clients this is not a nice to have. It is the difference between a system that passes review and one that gets rebuilt.
- 01
Set the budgets
Accessibility target, performance thresholds and browser support agreed before the first component is written.
- 02
Build the system
Components with semantics, states and keyboard paths designed in, verified as they are built rather than audited afterwards.
- 03
Prove it
Automated and manual passes against the production build, with the evidence handed over as a document.
What you get
Deliverables, not a status update.
- 01
Design system
Tokens, components and documentation, with accessibility and states built in rather than annotated on.
- 02
The platform
Server rendered, streamed where it helps, and fast on a mid range phone on a slow connection.
- 03
Accessibility evidence
Automated coverage plus manual keyboard and screen reader passes, with the findings and the fixes recorded.
- 04
Performance budget
LCP, CLS and INP thresholds enforced in CI against throttled conditions, not a local machine.
- 05
Technical SEO
Semantic structure, metadata, structured data, sitemap and canonical handling.
- 06
Reversible rollout
Flags and staged release, so shipping does not require confidence you do not have.
Questions
Answered straight.
- Do you work to Section 508 and EN 301 549?
- Yes. Both are close relatives of WCAG 2.2 AA, which is our default target, and we can produce the supporting documentation.
- Can you audit what we already have?
- Yes, and the useful version includes fixing the top findings rather than only listing them.
- Which stack?
- Usually Next.js or a similar server rendering framework, but the requirement decides. We will not port a working system for preference.
Start here
Have a web experience to build?
You will speak to an engineer, and you will leave the first conversation with an opinion about your problem whether or not you hire us.